Several commenters talked over that it took six to 12 months to crystal clear their names from allegedly untrue accusations. One commenter stated the course of action took 8 months to distinct the respondent's name and the respondent was banned from college throughout that time. We heard from numerous commenters who exclusively argued that the withdrawn 2011 Dear Colleague Letter was the trigger of the unfair Title IX method for respondents. One commenter argued that the program is tilted in favor of females of means who are connected to the school's donor foundation. Some commenters even more argued that colleges and universities do a critical disservice to would-be harassers and assaulters by developing an environment where, not like their long term perform environments, harassment and assault are tolerated. • Several commenters contended that a broad definition of sexual harassment led to nonsensical results. Several commenters explained conditions the place respondents had been suspended indefinitely from higher education without having thanks approach in excess of an allegedly unprovable and false accusation of sexual harassment. A selection of commenters reviewed the lack of thanks process protections in their working experience with Title IX proceedings.